Comments for Capital Area BSD Users Group

Comment on June 2008 by merdely

merdely — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:49:22 +0000

Sorry. No slides. I just demonstrated tmux for those present.

Comment on June 2008 by Anonymouse

Anonymouse — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:58:50 +0000

Are there slides for the tmux talk? I’m curious as to what makes it better than screen.

Comment on Linux Driver Copyright Violation by merdely

merdely — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:13:58 +0000

Update: Looks like Slashdot considers this news afterall:
http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/07/08/29/0241234.shtml

Comment on April Meeting – PF/CARP/pfsync by tbert

tbert — Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:06:13 +0000

Sorry I had to miss this (new IP phone system needed to be programmed before an 8 am switchover); I’m looking forward to video being posted.

Comment on New Website and New Name! by dap

dap — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 07:43:41 +0000

aweful wide a site. 3 columns is nice for somethings, but it doesn’t let the content flow as much as i’d like — particularly since it uses such a small font. this might be a default word-press thing, tho – i don’t know. also, even though i like it, you might prefer to have the favicon something other than the MD coat of arms as it was when this was capbug.

Comment on Logo Poll by mike

mike — Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:05:52 +0000

My favorite is #3 but I voted for #5 because there’s more whitespace to more easily read the letters. As for a “Web 2.0″ style, I think if we could get a little more whitespace in #3 and add a bezeled, shiny gloss to it, it’d be awesome.

Comment on Logo Poll by Jason Dixon

Jason Dixon — Wed, 07 Feb 2007 04:59:53 +0000

While I’m somewhat partial to the trendy “web 2.0″ style, the flag versions better represent our group vision. In particular, #5 works well at numerous scales due to the extra whitespace within the font. Scaling the other two down (font is Impact) tends to lose a lot of the character detail.